npm package report

Is xrpl safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.90%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-33qr-m49q-rxfx, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-33qr-m49q-rxfx

CRITICALCVE-2025-32965

Versions 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, and 4.2.4 of xrpl.js were compromised and contained malicious code designed to exfiltrate private keys. If you are using one of these versions, stop immediately and rotate any private keys or secrets used with affected systems.

Affected
>= 4.2.1, < 4.2.5, = 2.14.2
Fixed in
4.2.5
Weakness
CWE-506
Published
2025-04-22
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-04-22. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is xrpl safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ