npm package report

Is wrangler safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
8.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.60%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
5.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-f8mp-x433-5wpf, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-f8mp-x433-5wpf

CRITICALCVE-2023-7080

The V8 inspector intentionally allows arbitrary code execution within the Workers sandbox for debugging. wrangler dev would previously start an inspector server listening on all network interfaces. This would allow an attacker on the local network to connect to the inspector and run arbitrary code. Additionally, the inspector server did not validate Origin/Host headers, granting an attacker that c

Affected
>= 3.0.0, < 3.19.0, >= 2.0.0, < 2.20.2
Fixed in
3.19.0
Weakness
CWE-269
Published
2024-01-03
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:44 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-01-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is wrangler safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ