npm package report

Is vercel safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pgf8-2hgj-grqg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pgf8-2hgj-grqg

MODERATECVE-2026-44479

When the Vercel CLI runs in non-interactive mode (--non-interactive or auto-detected AI agent), commands that cannot complete autonomously emit JSON payloads with suggested follow-up commands. If the user authenticated via --token or -t on the command line, the token value is included verbatim in those suggestions.

Affected
>=50.16.0, <52.0.1, >= 50.16.0, <= 52.0.0
Fixed in
52.0.1
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2026-05-07
Source
osv

NVDMITREOSV


// dependencies

9 direct, 4 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:42 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is vercel safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ