npm package report

Is validator safe?

9 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.5

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vghf-hv5q-vc2g, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vghf-hv5q-vc2g

HIGHCVE-2025-12758

Versions of the package validator before 13.15.22 are vulnerable to Incomplete Filtering of One or More Instances of Special Elements in the isLength() function that does not take into account Unicode variation selectors (\uFE0F, \uFE0E) appearing in a sequence which lead to improper string length calculation. This can lead to an application using isLength for input validation accepting strings si

Affected
< 13.15.22
Fixed in
13.15.22
Weakness
CWE-172
Published
2025-11-27
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

1 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:40 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-11-27. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is validator safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ