npm package report

Is tmp safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.9

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm

HIGHCVE-2026-49982

The assertPath guard added to tmp@0.2.6 rejects only string values that contain the substring ... It is bypassed when prefix, postfix, or template is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose includes('..') returns falsy but whose stringification still contains ../. The value flows through Array.prototype.join/String coercion inside generateTmpName and path.join(tmpDir, o

Affected
>= 0.2.6, < 0.2.7
Fixed in
0.2.7
Weakness
CWE-20
Published
2026-06-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

3 direct, 1 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is tmp safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ