npm package report

Is st safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
34.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
5.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-69rr-wvh9-6c4q, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-69rr-wvh9-6c4q

HIGHCVE-2014-3744

Versions of st prior to 0.2.5 are affected by a directory traversal vulnerability. Vulnerable versions fail to properly handle URL encoded dots, which caused %2e to be interpreted as . by the filesystem, resulting the potential for an attacker to read sensitive files on the server.

Affected
< 0.2.5
Fixed in
0.2.5
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2020-08-31
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// dependencies

7 direct, 3 carrying known advisories, worst HIGH

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:40 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2020-08-31. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is st safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ