All versions of safer-eval are vulnerable to Sandbox Escape leading to Remote Code Execution.
Full advisory text at GitHub advisory.
safer-eval (npm) has 4 known vulnerabilities, the worst rated CRITICAL. No single fixed version is recorded that clears every advisory, so check each one below. No malicious-package signal is recorded.
0 direct dependencies
none carry a known advisory
Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.
severity band, no base score published
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CyberXYZ composite out of 10
fig. 01 — GHSA-876r-hj45-fw7g, the advisory selected below
All versions of safer-eval are vulnerable to Sandbox Escape leading to Remote Code Execution.
Full advisory text at GitHub advisory.
CyberXYZ does not call a package safe in absolute terms. It records 4 known vulnerabilities for safer-eval (npm), the worst rated CRITICAL, and no malicious-package signal. Whether it is acceptable depends on the version you run.
Yes. CyberXYZ records 4 known vulnerabilities for safer-eval (npm), the worst rated CRITICAL. They are GHSA-876r-hj45-fw7g, GHSA-v63x-xc9j-hhvq, GHSA-r3x4-wr4h-pw33, GHSA-hgch-jjmr-gp7w.
Search safer-eval in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=safer-eval. The xyz Scanner checks a project's dependencies, and CyberXYZ Proxy checks each package as it is installed.
Checked 2026-11-14 at 11:56 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2020-09-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.