npm package report

Is org.xwiki.contrib:application-ckeditor-ui safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
18.7%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.6

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-6mjp-2rm6-9g85, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-6mjp-2rm6-9g85

CRITICALCVE-2023-22457

The CKEditor.HTMLConverter document lacked a protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing to execute macros with the rights of the current user. If a privileged user with programming rights was tricked into executing a GET request to this document with certain parameters (e.g., via an image with a corresponding URL embedded in a comment or via a redirect), this would allow arbitr

Affected
< 1.64.3
Fixed in
1.64.3
Published
2023-01-06
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:50 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-01-06. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.xwiki.contrib:application-ckeditor-ui safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ