npm package report

Is oceanic.js safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.60%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-5h5v-hw44-f6gg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-5h5v-hw44-f6gg

MODERATECVE-2024-34712

Input to functions such as Client.rest.channels.removeBan is not url-encoded, resulting in specially crafted input such as ../../../channels/{id} being normalized into the url /api/v10/channels/{id}, and deleting a channel rather than removing a ban.

Affected: < 1.10.4
Fixed in: 1.10.4
Weakness: CWE-22
Published: 2024-05-14
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:36 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-05-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is oceanic.js safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ