npm package report

Is materialize-css safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7jvx-f994-rfw2, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7jvx-f994-rfw2

MODERATECVE-2022-25349

All versions of package materialize-css are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to improper escape of user input (such as <not-a-tag />) that is being parsed as HTML/JavaScript, and inserted into the Document Object Model (DOM). This vulnerability can be exploited when the user-input is provided to the autocomplete component.

Affected
<= 1.0.0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-05-03
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is materialize-css safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ