npm package report

Is ghost safe?

41 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-62q6-4hv4-vjrw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-62q6-4hv4-vjrw

CRITICALCVE-2026-53943

When Ghost is behind a shared caching layer that results in cached content being shared between different visitors (e.g., Fastly, Cloudflare, nginx proxycache, and others), an unauthenticated user could send an x-ghost-preview header that altered the rendered frontend response. In affected cache configurations, that response could be stored and served to subsequent visitors requesting the same pag

Affected
>= 4.0.0, <= 6.36.0
Fixed in
6.37.0
Weakness
CWE-524
Published
2026-07-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is ghost safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ