npm package report

Is follow-redirects safe?

8 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

3 direct dependencies

2 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

42 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


cvss
5.9
medium

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10; GitHub rates it HIGH

epss
0.27%
low

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 19th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.5
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mrwp-f3q8-3g9p, the advisory selected below

// 8 advisories

GHSA-mrwp-f3q8-3g9p

HIGHGitHub ratingCVE-2026-116689
// summary

follow-redirects 1.16.0 and 1.16.1 validate the documented sensitiveHeaders option with instanceof Array. An array created in another JavaScript realm is silently replaced with an empty list, so a caller-declared custom credential header can be forwarded to an attacker-controlled cross-origin redirect destination.

// details

Affected versions

The sensitiveHeaders option was introduced in 1.16.0. Published 1.16.0 and 1.16.1 both reproduced, giving a tested affected range of 1.16.0 through 1.16.1. The source checkout was pinned at revision 46301256333c; the exact npm 1.16.1 artifact reproduced independently.

Root cause

index.js resets options.sensitiveHeaders when its local isArray() helper returns false. That helper uses value instanceof Array, which depends on realm identity. The same file already uses Array.isArray(options.headers), which correctly recognizes arrays across realms.

Suggested remediation

Use Array.isArray(value) for sensitiveHeaders, then validate and normalize each member as a header-name string. Add same-realm and node:vm cross-realm tests for cross-origin redirects, including the array-form headers representation. Verify that custom sensitive names are removed while unrelated headers remain unchanged.

Duplicate review

The public advisory history contains other sensitive-header findings, including array-form headers and regular-expression handling, but focused repository searches found no report describing cross-realm validation as of 2026-10-25. A private or differently worded report may already exist.

// proof of concept

Start two loopback HTTP servers. The first returns a 302 redirect to the second. Send X-API-Key and list that name in sensitiveHeaders, then compare a normal array with a genuine cross-realm array created by:

const vm = require('node:vm');
const sensitiveHeaders = vm.runInNewContext(`['X-API-Key']`);

Observed against both source and the exact npm 1.16.1 package:

  • Same-realm ['X-API-Key']: the redirect target did not receive the key.
  • Cross-realm ['X-API-Key']: Array.isArray(value) was true, value instanceof Array was false, and the redirect target received X-API-Key.
  • An unrelated X-Harmless header remained present in both cases.

The complete 3.5 KB loopback-only harness and raw JSON output are available privately.

// impact

custom credential disclosure. Exploitation requires a direct caller or wrapper that preserves a cross-realm sensitiveHeaders array, a custom credential listed in that option, and an attacker-controlled or compromised endpoint that returns a cross-origin redirect. The directly demonstrated result is disclosure of the custom header value, potentially exposing an API key or service token until revocation.

Built-in Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, and Cookie protections remained effective. Exact Axios 1.20.0 with follow-redirects 1.16.1 did not reproduce because Axios normalized the array; this report does not claim that Axios is affected. No third-party service was tested.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Checked 2026-11-07 at 03:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-10-30. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.