extract-zip (npm) has 2 known vulnerabilities, the worst rated HIGH. No malicious-package signal is recorded.
0 packages depend on it
dependents not yet indexed for this ecosystem
Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.
CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10
chance of exploitation in 30 days, 40th percentile of all CVEs
CyberXYZ composite out of 10
fig. 01 — GHSA-7pqw-9j4j-h8q3, the advisory selected below
extract-zip through 2.0.1 containment-checks only the parent directory of each archive entry and never the entry's own final path component, so an archive…
Full advisory text at GitHub advisory or NVD.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CyberXYZ does not call a package safe in absolute terms. It records 2 known vulnerabilities for extract-zip (npm), the worst rated HIGH, and no malicious-package signal. Whether it is acceptable depends on the version you run.
Yes. CyberXYZ records 2 known vulnerabilities for extract-zip (npm), the worst rated HIGH. They are GHSA-7pqw-9j4j-h8q3, GHSA-jmr9-qjv8-65gv.
Search extract-zip in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=extract-zip. The xyz Scanner checks a project's dependencies, and CyberXYZ Proxy checks each package as it is installed.
Checked 2026-11-13 at 22:03 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.