npm package report

Is eth-ledger-bridge-keyring safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vg44-fw64-cpjx, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vg44-fw64-cpjx

HIGH

Anybody using this library to sign with a BIP44 account other than the first account may be affected. If a user is signing with the first account (i.e. the account at index 0), or with the legacy MEW/MyCrypto HD path, they are not affected.

Affected: < 0.2.1, >=0, <0.2.1, <0.2.2
Fixed in: 0.2.1
Weakness: CWE-287
Published: 2020-03-24
Source: github

GHSA reference reference reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2020-03-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is eth-ledger-bridge-keyring safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ