npm package report

Is basti-cdk safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
2.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-q4pp-j36h-3gqg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-q4pp-j36h-3gqg

LOW

The provided Minimal IAM Policy for bastic connect does not include ssm:SessionDocumentAccessCheck. This results in the ability to get a shell session on the bastion, not just the intended access for Port Forwarding.

Affected
< 1.0.1
Fixed in
1.0.1
Published
2023-08-24
Source
github

GHSAreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-08-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is basti-cdk safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ