npm package report

Is @vitest/browser safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss

9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

5.2

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv

CRITICAL

Browser Mode exposes a set of built-in "commands" that run on the Node.js side of the test runner and can touch the local filesystem (taking screenshots, managing Playwright traces, uploading files for <input type="file">, comparing screenshots).

Affected: >=4.0.0, <4.1.10, >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.10
Fixed in: 4.1.10
Weakness: CWE-22
Published: 2026-07-21
Source: osv

OSV

// dependencies

15 direct, 2 carrying known advisories, worst HIGH

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @vitest/browser safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ