npm package report

Is @vercel/flags safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-892p-pqrr-hxqr, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-892p-pqrr-hxqr

MODERATECVE-2025-46332

An information disclosure vulnerability affecting Flags SDK has been addressed. It impacted flags ≤3.2.0 and @vercel/flags ≤3.1.1 and in certain circumstances, allowed a bad actor with detailed knowledge of the vulnerability to list all flags returned by the flags discovery endpoint (.well-known/vercel/flags).

Affected: <= 3.1.1
Fixed in: not stated
Weakness: CWE-200
Published: 2025-05-02
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-05-02. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @vercel/flags safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ