npm package report

Is @typespec/spector safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.8

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7q9c-hpx7-9cwm, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7q9c-hpx7-9cwm

HIGH

@typespec/spector registers a POST /.admin/stop HTTP route with no authentication, authorization token, Origin check, or IP-source restriction. Any network-reachable client can send a single unauthenticated POST request to terminate the mock server process. Because the server binds to 0.0.0.0 by default (all interfaces), this endpoint is exposed to any host that can reach the server's port—not jus

Affected
<= 0.1.0-alpha.26, >=0, <0.1.0-alpha.27
Fixed in
0.1.0-alpha.27
Weakness
CWE-306
Published
2026-09-04
Source
github

GHSAreferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:32 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @typespec/spector safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ