npm package report

Is @typebot.io/js safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-6m7c-xfhp-p9fh, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-6m7c-xfhp-p9fh

HIGHCVE-2026-28445

The rating block's custom icon feature accepts arbitrary HTML/SVG via the customIcon.svg field and renders it using Solid's innerHTML directive without any sanitization. When a malicious typebot is imported or crafted by a workspace collaborator, the payload executes in the builder's DOM context (builder.typebot.io), bypassing the isUnsafe Web Worker sandbox that protects Script blocks during prev

Affected
>=0, <0.10.1, < 0.10.1
Fixed in
0.10.1
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2026-05-26
Source
osv

NVDMITREOSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-26. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @typebot.io/js safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ