npm package report

Is @turbo-boost/commands safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.8

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mp76-7w5v-pr75, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-mp76-7w5v-pr75

HIGHCVE-2024-28181

TurboBoost Commands has existing protections in place to guarantee that only public methods on Command classes can be invoked; however, the existing checks aren't as robust as they should be. It's possible for a sophisticated attacker to invoke more methods than should be permitted depending on the the strictness of authorization checks that individual applications enforce. Being able to call some

Affected
>= 0.2.0, < 0.2.2, < 0.1.3
Fixed in
0.2.2
Weakness
CWE-74
Published
2024-03-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

1 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:46 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-03-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @turbo-boost/commands safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ