npm package report

Is @tiptap/extension-link safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
5.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vhrc-hgrq-x75r, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vhrc-hgrq-x75r

LOWCVE-2025-14284

Versions of the package @tiptap/extension-link before 2.10.4 are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to unsanitized user input allowed in setting or toggling links. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the application by injecting a javascript: URL payload into these attributes, which is then triggered either by user interaction.

Affected
< 2.10.4
Fixed in
2.10.4
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2025-12-09
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:44 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-12-09. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @tiptap/extension-link safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ