npm package report

Is @tinacms/graphql safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w

HIGHCVE-2026-34603

@tinacms/cli recently added lexical path-traversal checks to the dev media routes, but the implementation still validates only the path string and does not resolve symlink or junction targets.

Affected
<= 2.2.1
Fixed in
2.2.2
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2026-04-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-04-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @tinacms/graphql safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ