npm package report

Is @scullyio/scully safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r96p-v3cr-gfv8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r96p-v3cr-gfv8

HIGHCVE-2020-28470

This affects the package @scullyio/scully before 1.0.9. The transfer state is serialised with the JSON.stringify() function and then written into the HTML page.

Affected
< 1.0.9
Fixed in
1.0.9
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2021-04-13
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-04-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @scullyio/scully safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ