npm package report

Is @replit/crosis safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
8.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7w54-gp8x-f33m, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7w54-gp8x-f33m

MODERATECVE-2022-21671

When using this library as a way to programmatically communicate with Replit in a standalone fashion, if there are multiple failed attempts to contact Replit through a WebSocket, the library will attempt to communicate using a fallback poll-based proxy. The URL of the proxy has changed, so any communication done to the previous URL could potentially reach a server that is outside of Replit's contr

Affected
< 7.3.1
Fixed in
7.3.1
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2022-01-12
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 04:25 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-01-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @replit/crosis safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ