npm package report

Is @quasar/ssl-certificate safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-fh39-c73x-5pjv, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-fh39-c73x-5pjv

      HIGHCVE-2026-106105

      The @quasar/ssl-certificate development utility caches a combined PEM containing a generated private key and certificate without explicitly restricting its filesystem permissions. On systems with a typical process umask, the PEM can be readable by other local users. A local attacker with filesystem access could copy and reuse the private key to impersonate a development TLS endpoint in an environment that trusts the certificate.

      The generated certificate was also unnecessarily CA-capable and included broad key usages beyond its localhost HTTPS purpose. Its IPv6 loopback entry was encoded as a DNS name rather than an IP subject alternative name.

      The remediation writes and repairs the cached PEM with owner-only permissions on supported platforms, generates a non-CA server-auth leaf certificate with constrained key usage, corrects the IPv6 loopback SAN, and bases cache expiry on content modification time so permission metadata changes cannot extend the certificate lifetime. This issue does not expose the key remotely by itself; exploitation requires another local user to be able to read the cached PEM file.

      // cvss v4.0 vector

      CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

      Attack vector
      Local
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Attack requirements
      None
      Privileges required
      Low
      User interaction
      None
      Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
      High
      Integrity (vulnerable system)
      High
      Availability (vulnerable system)
      None
      Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
      None
      Integrity (subsequent systems)
      None
      Availability (subsequent systems)
      None

      Checked 2026-10-07 at 18:32 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-10-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.