npm package report

Is @pnpm/linuxstatic-arm64 safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-5r98-f33j-g8h7, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-5r98-f33j-g8h7

HIGHCVE-2023-37478

It is possible to construct a tarball that, when installed via npm or parsed by the registry is safe, but when installed via pnpm is malicious, due to how pnpm parses tar archives.

Affected
>= 8.0.0, < 8.6.8, < 7.33.4
Fixed in
8.6.8
Weakness
CWE-284
Published
2023-08-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-08-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @pnpm/linuxstatic-arm64 safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ