npm package report

Is @perfood/couch-auth safe?

5 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mjqr-5c55-g77h, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-mjqr-5c55-g77h

HIGHCVE-2025-70949

An Observable Timing Discrepancy in @perfood/couch-auth v0.26.0 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a timing side-channel.

Affected
<= 0.26.0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-208
Published
2026-03-05
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @perfood/couch-auth safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ