npm package report

Is @openclaw/nextcloud-talk safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r5h9-vjqc-hq3r, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r5h9-vjqc-hq3r

CRITICALCVE-2026-28474

In affected versions of the optional Nextcloud Talk plugin (installed separately; not bundled with the core OpenClaw install), an untrusted webhook field (actor.name, display name) could be treated as an allowlist identifier. An attacker could change their Nextcloud display name to match an allowlisted user ID and bypass DM or room allowlists.

Affected
<= 2026.2.2, >=0, <2026.2.6
Fixed in
2026.2.6
Weakness
CWE-290
Published
2026-02-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-02-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @openclaw/nextcloud-talk safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ