npm package report

Is @nextcloud/dialogs safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-g3fq-3v3g-mh32, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-g3fq-3v3g-mh32

MODERATECVE-2021-29438

The Nextcloud dialogs library before 3.1.2 did insufficiently escape text input passed to a toast. If your application displays toasts with user-supplied input, this could lead to a XSS vulnerability.

Affected
< 3.1.2
Fixed in
3.1.2
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2021-04-16
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// dependencies

6 direct, 1 carrying known advisories, worst LOW

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-04-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @nextcloud/dialogs safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ