npm package report

Is @netlify/ipx safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-9jjv-524m-jm98, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-9jjv-524m-jm98

MODERATECVE-2022-39239

By sending specially crafted headers an attacker can bypass the source image domain allowlist, causing the handler to load and return arbitrary images. Because the response is cached globally, this image will then be served to visitors without requiring those headers to be set. XSS can be achieved by requesting a malicious SVG with embedded scripts, which would then be served from the site domain.

Affected
< 1.2.3
Fixed in
1.2.3
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-09-21
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-09-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @netlify/ipx safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ