npm package report

Is @metamask/sdk safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qj3p-xc97-xw74, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qj3p-xc97-xw74

MODERATE

This advisory only applies to developers who use MetaMask SDK in the browser and who, on Sept 8th 2025 between 13:00–15:30 UTC, performed one of the following actions and then deployed their application:

Affected: >= 0.16.0, <= 0.33.0, >=0.16.0, <0.33.1
Fixed in: 0.33.1
Weakness: CWE-506
Published: 2025-09-15
Source: github

GHSA reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:30 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-09-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @metamask/sdk safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ