npm package report

Is @merill/lokka safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-g2gw-q38m-vjfc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-g2gw-q38m-vjfc

HIGH

Lokka versions prior to 2.1.2 constructed Azure Resource Manager request URLs using direct string concatenation with user-controlled path input. Specially crafted path values could alter URL authority parsing and cause Azure Resource Manager bearer tokens to be sent to an unintended host. Version 2.1.2 fixes the issue by validating Azure paths before token acquisition and constructing Azure Resour

Affected
>=0, <2.1.2, < 2.1.2
Fixed in
2.1.2
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-06-19
Source
osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @merill/lokka safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ