npm package report

Is @materializecss/materialize safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7752-f4gf-94gc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7752-f4gf-94gc

MODERATECVE-2019-11003

All versions of materialize-css are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. The autocomplete component does not sufficiently sanitize user input, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code if the malicious input is rendered by a user.

Affected: < 1.1.0-alpha
Fixed in: 1.1.0-alpha
Weakness: CWE-79
Published: 2019-04-09
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2019-04-09. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @materializecss/materialize safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ