npm package report

Is @lobehub/lobehub safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.8%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xmwj-c75x-6346, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xmwj-c75x-6346

CRITICALCVE-2026-54157

The /webapi/proxy endpoint on app.lobehub.com accepts a URL in the POST body and fetches it server-side without any authentication. This is the same proxy code that was vulnerable in CVE-2024-32964, where /api/proxy was fixed by adding auth middleware. The /webapi/proxy route was never secured — it is the only webapi route missing the checkAuth() wrapper. An attacker can use this to make arbitrary

Affected
>=0, <2.1.57, <= 2.1.56
Fixed in
2.1.57
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-06-16
Source
osv

NVDMITREOSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:48 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @lobehub/lobehub safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ