npm package report

Is @hapi/accept safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-9vrw-m88g-w75q, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-9vrw-m88g-w75q

HIGH

Versions of @hapi/accept prior to 3.2.4 or 5.0.1 are vulnerable to Denial of Service. The Accept-Encoding HTTP header parser has a vulnerability which will cause the function to throw a system error if the header contains some invalid values. Because hapi rethrows system errors (as opposed to catching expected application errors), the error is thrown all the way up the stack. If no unhandled excep

Affected
>= 4.0.0, < 5.0.1, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.4
Fixed in
5.0.1
Published
2020-09-03
Source
github

GHSAreference

// dependencies

2 direct, 2 carrying known advisories, worst HIGH

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:50 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2020-09-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @hapi/accept safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ