npm package report

Is @file-viewer/doc safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

8.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-3753-m2x2-q623, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-3753-m2x2-q623

HIGHCVE-2026-91127

Before 2.3.1, the legacy .doc renderer emitted document hyperlink targets after HTML escaping but without a URL-scheme allowlist. A crafted .doc could therefore render a live javascript:, vbscript:, data:, or similarly unsafe link. Script could execute in the embedding origin if a viewer clicked it.

Affected: <= 2.3.0
Fixed in: 2.3.1
Weakness: CWE-79
Published: 2026-09-18
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @file-viewer/doc safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ