npm package report

Is @fedify/fedify safe?

7 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

8.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xw9q-2mv6-9fr8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xw9q-2mv6-9fr8

HIGHCVE-2026-50131

Fedify previously addressed SSRF/internal network access in GHSA-p9cg-vqcc-grcx by adding public URL validation before runtime document and media fetching. However, the current IPv4 validation logic appears incomplete.

Affected: >= 0.11.2, < 1.9.12
Fixed in: 1.9.12
Weakness: CWE-918
Published: 2026-07-14
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:32 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @fedify/fedify safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ