npm package report

Is @evershop/evershop safe?

11 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-32r3-57hp-cgfw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-32r3-57hp-cgfw

CRITICALCVE-2023-46943

An issue was discovered in NPM's package @evershop/evershop before version 1.0.0-rc.9. The HMAC secret used for generating tokens is hardcoded as "secret". A weak HMAC secret poses a risk because attackers can use the predictable secret to create valid JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), allowing them access to important information and actions within the application.

Affected
< 1.0.0-rc.9
Fixed in
1.0.0-rc.9
Weakness
CWE-284
Published
2024-01-13
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

92 direct, 27 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:48 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-01-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @evershop/evershop safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ