npm package report

Is @directus/api safe?

7 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss

9.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

1.3%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

4.5

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mv33-9f6j-pfmc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-mv33-9f6j-pfmc

CRITICALCVE-2025-55746

A vulnerability exists in the file update mechanism which allows an unauthenticated actor to modify existing files with arbitrary contents (without changes being applied to the files' database-resident metadata) and / or upload new files, with arbitrary content and extensions, which won't show up in the Directus UI.

Affected: >= 14.1.0, < 28.0.2
Fixed in: 28.0.2
Weakness: CWE-73
Published: 2025-08-20
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-08-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @directus/api safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ