npm package report

Is @dicebear/converter safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7j2x-32w6-p43p, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7j2x-32w6-p43p

HIGHCVE-2026-33418

The ensureSize() function in @dicebear/converter used a regex-based approach to rewrite SVG width/height attributes, capping them at 2048px to prevent denial of service. This size capping could be bypassed by crafting SVG input that causes the regex to match a non-functional occurrence of <svg before the actual SVG root element. When the SVG is subsequently rendered via @resvg/resvg-js on the Node

Affected
<= 9.4.1
Fixed in
9.4.2
Weakness
CWE-185
Published
2026-03-20
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:44 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @dicebear/converter safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ