npm package report

Is @dcl/single-sign-on-client safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vp4f-wxgw-7x8x, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vp4f-wxgw-7x8x

HIGHCVE-2023-41049

Improper input validation in the init function allows arbitrary javascript to be executed using the javascript: prefix

Affected
< 0.1.0
Fixed in
0.1.0
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2023-09-04
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:48 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-09-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @dcl/single-sign-on-client safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ