npm package report

Is @contentful/mcp-server safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-2xhg-73j7-rrgx, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-2xhg-73j7-rrgx

HIGHCVE-2026-53957

exportspace and importspace tools in @contentful/mcp-tools accept LLM-controlled host and proxy parameters that are spread directly into the options object passed to contentful-export / contentful-import. These libraries pass the merged options — including the attacker-controlled host — to the Contentful Management API (CMA) SDK, which builds baseURL from host and attaches the server's CMA Persona

Affected
< 1.7.19, >=0, <0.4.5
Fixed in
1.7.19
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-08-19
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @contentful/mcp-server safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ