npm package report

Is @clerk/nuxt safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9

HIGHCVE-2025-53548

Applications that use the verifyWebhook() helper to verify incoming Clerk webhooks are susceptible to accepting improperly signed webhook events.

Affected
>= 1.7.0, < 1.7.5
Fixed in
1.7.5
Weakness
CWE-345
Published
2025-07-09
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-07-09. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @clerk/nuxt safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ