npm package report

Is @builder.io/qwik safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss

9.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

5.4%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

4.7

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p9x5-jp3h-96mm, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p9x5-jp3h-96mm

CRITICALCVE-2026-27971

qwik <=1.19.0 is vulnerable to RCE due to an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the server$ RPC mechanism that allows any unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the server with a single HTTP request. Affects any deployment where require() is available at runtime.

Affected: <= 1.19.0
Fixed in: 1.19.1
Weakness: CWE-502
Published: 2026-03-02
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-02. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @builder.io/qwik safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ