npm package report

Is @bsv/sdk safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

5.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vjpq-xx5g-qvmm, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vjpq-xx5g-qvmm

MODERATECVE-2025-69287

A critical cryptographic vulnerability in the TypeScript SDK's BRC-104 authentication implementation caused incorrect signature data preparation, resulting in signature incompatibility [between SDK implementations](https://github.com/F1r3Hydr4nt/brc104-cross-language-tests) and potential authentication bypass scenarios.

Affected: < 2.0.0
Fixed in: 2.0.0
Weakness: CWE-573
Published: 2026-02-17
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-02-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @bsv/sdk safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ