npm package report

Is @better-auth/oauth-provider safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.9

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7w99-5wm4-3g79, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7w99-5wm4-3g79

HIGHCVE-2026-53518

Users are affected if all of the following are true:

Affected
>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.11, >=0, <1.6.11
Fixed in
1.6.11
Weakness
CWE-294
Published
2026-07-07
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

1 direct, 1 carrying known advisories, worst MEDIUM

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @better-auth/oauth-provider safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ