npm package report

Is @backstage/techdocs-common safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-4jqc-jvh2-pxg9, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-4jqc-jvh2-pxg9

MODERATE

A malicious actor with the ability to register entities in the Software Catalog is able to write files to arbitrary paths on the techdocs backend host instance when techdocs.publisher.type is set to local.

Affected
< 0.11.16
Fixed in
0.11.16
Published
2022-06-17
Source
github

GHSAreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-06-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @backstage/techdocs-common safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ