npm package report

Is @backstage/plugin-techdocs safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.8

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-gg96-f8wr-p89f, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-gg96-f8wr-p89f

MODERATECVE-2021-32661

A malicious internal actor can potentially upload documentation content with malicious scripts by embedding the script within an object element. This may give access to sensitive data when other users visit that same documentation page.

Affected
< 0.9.5
Fixed in
0.9.5
Weakness
CWE-77
Published
2021-06-04
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:31 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-06-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @backstage/plugin-techdocs safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ