npm package report

Is @asyncapi/modelina safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
10.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.1%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-4jg2-84c2-pj95, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-4jg2-84c2-pj95

CRITICALCVE-2023-23619

Anyone who is using the default presets and/or does not handle the functionality themself.

Affected
< 1.0.0
Fixed in
1.0.0
Weakness
CWE-94
Published
2021-09-21
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:30 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-09-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @asyncapi/modelina safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ